<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peter Williams &#187; phone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barelyenough.org/blog/tag/phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barelyenough.org</link>
	<description>… and there is much to be learned</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Sad State of Mobile Phones</title>
		<link>http://barelyenough.org/blog/2007/11/the-sad-state-of-mobile-phones/</link>
		<comments>http://barelyenough.org/blog/2007/11/the-sad-state-of-mobile-phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Williams</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[style]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pezra.barelyenough.org/blog/2007/11/the-sad-state-of-mobile-phones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The current crop of phones are depressingly lame.  I am currently
using a Samsung t519.  It has served me well for pretty close
to two years now.  My two biggest complaints with it are that phone
allowed T-Mobile to permanently hijacked the right soft button, and that is, perhaps, a tiny bit too thick.  [...] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current crop of phones are depressingly lame.  I am currently
using a <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/cell-phones/samsung-trace-sgh-t519/4505-6454_7-32069582.html">Samsung t519</a>.  It has served me well for pretty close
to two years now.  My two biggest complaints with it are that phone
allowed <a href="http://www.t-mobile.com">T-Mobile</a> to permanently hijacked the right soft button, and that is, perhaps, a tiny bit too thick.  That second
complaint is particularly unfortunate given the fact that I believe it to
be the thinnest phone ever available in the US.</p>

<p>A few days ago I dropped my phone.  It still works but case cracked so I decided
that it was probably time for a new phone.  Two years is a pretty good
run for a phone.  So I mossied over to my local T-Mobile kiosk to take
a look at what is available.  Man does the selection suck.  The are
all bricks with absolutely no sense of style.  Hell, my very first
cell phone, the <a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/phones/Nokia_2190.php">Nokia 2190</a>, (in 1997) looked almost as good
as most of the phone available today.  And it was only a little
bigger.</p>

<p>How is it that phones have gotten less interesting, and larger, in the
last two years?  I guess I am not the target market for phones being
produced today.  If someone where to produce a <em>thin</em> candy bar with a
decent sense of style and a reasonable feature set I would definitely
be interested.  Until that happens I think I am just oing to continue
to use my
two-year-old-but-still-better-than-anything-that-is-available-today
phone until it actually stops working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barelyenough.org/blog/2007/11/the-sad-state-of-mobile-phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
